How Do You Choose a Budget Anamorphic Lens or Adapter?

The path to acquiring and using anamorphic lenses and adapters isn’t always clear. 

This post was written by Tito Ferradans.

For the last seven years, I have talked about anamorphic lenses and adapters on my YouTube channel. I had reviewed dozens of adapters until late 2019 when Sirui came out with its 50mm f/1.8 1.33x anamorphic lens.

Since then, we’ve seen a flood of new anamorphic lenses from Sirui and other makers, which have worked hard to bring the anamorphic look to filmmakers working on a tight budget. If you’re not familiar with it, anamorphic lenses usually cost tens of thousands of dollars, and we little-budget folks have always coveted the look they deliver.

Credit: Tito Ferradans

If you’re getting into the game now, you’re doing it at what’s probably the best time in forever. There are plenty of options to choose from. You can start with adapters, which cost anywhere between $50 and $3,500 and allow you to use your own spherical lenses behind them for a look that’s somewhat familiar.

Or you can get started with one of the many affordable anamorphic lens sets out there, which can come with their own quirks depending on the price. 

Take Me to the Adapters!

While offering great versatility and more affordable prices (depending on your level of commitment), adapters also offer a number of challenges. In the video below, I detail many of these challenges. It’s important to clarify I’m not saying adapters are bad. They’re just not for me, as I go through many of them and never get to spend enough time setting one up properly.

A multitude of other enthusiasts love adapters, though! They’ve picked up one that delivers the look they like and spent weeks, months, and years perfecting their systems. And there’s not really a formula here, as it becomes a very personal journey of exploration and refinement.

Credit: Tito Ferradans

Working with an adapter rig requires you to develop a relationship with your equipment. You know its strengths—and you play to them—and you know its limitations—which you avoid as best you can. It also hits the note of using equipment that’s been around for decades, and it’s been appreciated and revered as tools of a craft. You’re part collector, part lens tech, and all patience when building around an adapter.

Besides the personality of the adapter itself, you get to choose the spherical elements (or taking lens) that go behind it. So if you already have a 50mm that you love, you get to see how that pairs up with your chosen adapter. This is a really fun adventure to partake in, but I warn you, it takes time. Really. And by rushing the process, you’re simply missing the good parts.

This is not a carefully crafted evaluation, but I’d say most folks that like using adapters are not focused on *making films* but enjoy the gear and the experience of tinkering with it. The empowerment provided by such gear, and the capability to go out and make a film, is a great bonus, but mostly they are solo filmmakers and lens testers. If you see yourself as so, adapters might be for you. Exceptions exist, of course, and if you’re one of them, please leave a comment below! I love seeing bigger productions filmed with adapters!

Credit: Tito Ferradans

Budget Anamorphic Lenses

A few months ago, a member of my channel asked the following: “When looking at Sirui, Great Joy, and Laowa side by side, who are each of these lenses for? And what are the attributes that would lead a user to choose one over the other?”

I thought this was greatly worded, so let’s discuss these offerings and how they might or might not be a good fit for you and your filmmaking style.

The video above covers the inception of low-budget anamorphic lenses and many of their personality traits. Below you will find a chart that organizes all of them in a way that you can easily compare them to one another and also includes some lenses not mentioned in the video.

Credit: Lens-yclopedia

Sirui

Lenses

With Sirui’s first set, the company started with a 1.33x squeeze factor because it turns a 16:9 sensor into a 2.37:1 aspect ratio. This is almost Cinemascope, so why would you need more squeeze? However, for a 3:2 or 4:3 sensor, this just isn’t enough.

They also leaned heavily on flares, which may or may not be what you need. The Sirui MARS set (pictured below) is super simple and reliable to use on MFT cameras. For their cost, the lenses delivered a level of simplicity I really missed from all the time I spent with adapters.

Credit: Tiro Ferradans

Then Sirui noticed that the 1.33x squeeze factor and APS-C sensor still left a lot of market open, which pushed them into full-frame offerings. They stuck with mirrorless options because they kept costs and lens sizes down.

Sirui’s full-frame lenses feel too sharp for me, even on full frame and wide open, and they lean away from what I want in a “cheap yet classic anamorphic lens.” Sirui is trying but going slowly and cashing in as much as they can in the process with crowdfunding campaigns and a staggering number of product releases.

Sirui’s Venus full-frame set might be the last stop for a lot of folks. They’re super affordable, deliver sharp results, have good (yet not great) minimum focus, and feature pronounced flares that many people love, even though many others are vocal against the streaks! I feel it’s a very versatile set, and if you just need to get stuff done quickly and easily, this might be the one for you.

Great Joy to Be Here!

A lot of people love adapters because you can put those onto your own spherical bases, and that’s what Great Joy offered. Its 60mm initial lens is okay at best, but the combo with its adapter gives out really nice images.

With Sirui’s move onto full-frame, Great Joy pushed to one-up its competitor by delivering a stronger squeeze factor of 1.8x versus 1.6x on some Sirui lenses. It also offered the option of PL and EF mounts which are not as “friendly” as one would expect. Especially when the company markets its lenses as “full frame EF,” which you can’t put on a focal reducer.

Credit: Tito Ferradans

I feel Great Joy is the one catering the most to the indie cinema world, with their choice of PL and EF mounts, as well as an established 1.8X squeeze that is ideal for 4:3 recording and 2.39:1 delivery. The lenses also have all the bells and whistles of cinema lenses, with geared rings and matching mechanics across the set. They’re really well put together and go for a price that aims to hurt Sirui’s hold on the market. However, I just find them a little too bland so far. At least for my taste. 

Venus Optics LAOWA Nanomorphs

Last, we’ve got Laowa from Venus Optics, a company that has emphasized the small lens form factor. The Laowa Nanomorphs settled for APS-C from the start and came in with a wide variety of mounts. Laowa is more established in the market than both Sirui and Great Joy and can afford to come up with multiple focal lengths and coatings all at once.

Credit: Tito Ferradans

To be honest, I don’t love the flares these lenses make. That said, the concept of the set is brilliant. A 1.5x squeeze factor in such a tiny package is awesome for travel, gimbal, or even FPV. Anyone who wants to go under the radar or be unobtrusive is gonna lean toward this set. The variety in flare color and mounts is also great, but I feel these are never going to be as popular as Sirui’s full frame set.

What Are Your Other Options?

We recently got the announcement of the Atlas Mercury lenses, which are also designed for full-frame sensors but feature a lot more expertise into what makes up the “anamorphic look” besides squeeze numbers and bright flares (or lack of flares).

Credit: Atlas Lens Co.

One Mercury lens is still pricier than the whole Sirui full frame set, but the images coming from them are the most appealing to me these days—giving the type of look I want to achieve, and was closer to achieving while using adapters. Here’s a sample of the look they can achieve:

So What’s the Right Answer?

It has been a very interesting journey to play with adapters for several years, then experiment with a variety of new anamorphic lenses, all with different qualities and prices. At first, I just wanted simplicity, as adapters are a pain to handle. But as I test more and more “clean” anamorphic lenses, I’m finally starting to figure out what I want in terms of “the look” besides the simplicity of lenses versus adapters.

For me, the answer will always lie in what I want my final image to look like, and that may require an adapter. Sometimes, it might ask for a pricey Atlas lens. Hopefully, you can find your answer after reading this article. 

What are your thoughts on this? Are adapters still the way to go for you, or are you leaning toward any of the more recent lens options we’ve seen on the market? I’d love to get your input in the comments below.